This article was nominated for deletion on 7 July 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Sushmita Ruj is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
Other than citations, there is nothing impressive about this researcher based on my research. If Wikipedia is to list everyone that has some citation, then every academic should have a page. This page looks more like self-promotion as much more senior and cited researchers do not have a Wiki page. There should be significant work by an academic to have a Wiki page. This page should be deleted, or the criteria for having a Wiki page should be clarified - in the history of this page, there is only a reference to this person's citation. 49.181.220.86 (talk) 01:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
While you're talking to yourself, perhaps you could explain which of the significant contributors to the article history you think is the "self" that is doing the self-promotion here. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
it's not the article sources. You are clearly biased with the tone you are using in your reply. I ask again, do all academics at all universities have a Wiki page? have you seen the recent rankings based on publications? academics who deserve a Wiki page are those who have had an actual significant contribution to their field recognised for it. Either way, let's leave this conversation here public so users can judge. 49.186.30.211 (talk) 01:12, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=logo}
